h2o_dog's concerns about feeding ducks
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2002 3:14 pm
I'm starting yet another string on this subject, because I'm curious to know what y'all think about something that bothers me. (And the other strings were getting their topics confused) I am concerned that legal supplemental feeding in natural waterfowl habitat may have the potential to change migration patterns of waterfowl. I throwing out some possible scenarios:
This is not complicated.
Scenario #1:
Ot is perfectly EASY for me to believe that PETA could go onto a NFWS refuge (or a DU refuge, or a Jack Minor refuge, or a PETA REFUGE, or a private landowners refuge) in the Dakotas or Iowa (with the full blessing of the refuge landowner and NFWS) and put out grain for BIRDS (not waterfowl specifically) to eat. I'm not aware of any illegality of "supplementing natural forage" (baiting) in a refuge where hunting does not occur.
Doing this PETA is not helping hunters in the short term, because as long as those birds stay on that refuge they are not at risk of being shot by ANYONE ANYWHERE. PETA is VERY VERY happy about this!!!! Everytime PETA goes to feed the birds they see the numbers and say "All these birds would be dead right now if PETA didn't come here and feed them and make sure they stay here where they are safe". Furthermore they video the situation and show it to potential tree-hugging supporters saying "Hunters will kill these birds within 24 hours of them leaving the sancutary of our refuge. Please send us your money so that these birds will not die".
The birds stay in IOWA fat and happy.
Scenario #2.
What if after the season is over I build 20 floating/submerged grain feeders, fill them up, and put them out in my brake around my duckblind.
Purpose: to imprint the ducks in the area to use my brake.
Legality: LEGAL - It's not duck season and no one is hunting anything within 2 miles of the feed.
Scenario #3.
Mr. Smith farms 6000 acres in northern Iowa. Recently he has made more income from guiding waterfowl hunts on his property than he has from the corn, milo, and soybeans he produces. Joe decides to cull the low-grade grain (moisture damage or weed infested) harvest this year into a seperate grain bin on the farm rather than selling it at the reduced price it will fetch. After his guide service shuts down at the end of duck season he takes this grain and distributes it in the various duckholes on the property. His intent is to make the ducks familiar with his property, so that they will return to it next year, hopefully BEFORE the end of Iowa's duck season). Another advantage to this program is that his held ducks will definitely live to make the trip next year, since they won't go to MS to be shot there.
Granted, scenario 1 and 3 may not work if 2 feet of snow blanket the Dakotas and IOWA, but it wouldn't be beyond PETA to install pond warmers to keep water open to save their precious birdies either.
And I'm not suggesting that EVERY duck would be affected by this, but I do worry that over time, if more of this goes on, migration and nesting patterns COULD change in the future.
I AM NOT COMPLAINING ABOUT NOT HAVING DUCKS!!! I've got a few ducks in our brake, and so long as my dog gets to pickup at least a mallard or two on every hunt I'm happy.
This is not complicated.
Scenario #1:
Ot is perfectly EASY for me to believe that PETA could go onto a NFWS refuge (or a DU refuge, or a Jack Minor refuge, or a PETA REFUGE, or a private landowners refuge) in the Dakotas or Iowa (with the full blessing of the refuge landowner and NFWS) and put out grain for BIRDS (not waterfowl specifically) to eat. I'm not aware of any illegality of "supplementing natural forage" (baiting) in a refuge where hunting does not occur.
Doing this PETA is not helping hunters in the short term, because as long as those birds stay on that refuge they are not at risk of being shot by ANYONE ANYWHERE. PETA is VERY VERY happy about this!!!! Everytime PETA goes to feed the birds they see the numbers and say "All these birds would be dead right now if PETA didn't come here and feed them and make sure they stay here where they are safe". Furthermore they video the situation and show it to potential tree-hugging supporters saying "Hunters will kill these birds within 24 hours of them leaving the sancutary of our refuge. Please send us your money so that these birds will not die".
The birds stay in IOWA fat and happy.
Scenario #2.
What if after the season is over I build 20 floating/submerged grain feeders, fill them up, and put them out in my brake around my duckblind.
Purpose: to imprint the ducks in the area to use my brake.
Legality: LEGAL - It's not duck season and no one is hunting anything within 2 miles of the feed.
Scenario #3.
Mr. Smith farms 6000 acres in northern Iowa. Recently he has made more income from guiding waterfowl hunts on his property than he has from the corn, milo, and soybeans he produces. Joe decides to cull the low-grade grain (moisture damage or weed infested) harvest this year into a seperate grain bin on the farm rather than selling it at the reduced price it will fetch. After his guide service shuts down at the end of duck season he takes this grain and distributes it in the various duckholes on the property. His intent is to make the ducks familiar with his property, so that they will return to it next year, hopefully BEFORE the end of Iowa's duck season). Another advantage to this program is that his held ducks will definitely live to make the trip next year, since they won't go to MS to be shot there.
Granted, scenario 1 and 3 may not work if 2 feet of snow blanket the Dakotas and IOWA, but it wouldn't be beyond PETA to install pond warmers to keep water open to save their precious birdies either.
And I'm not suggesting that EVERY duck would be affected by this, but I do worry that over time, if more of this goes on, migration and nesting patterns COULD change in the future.
I AM NOT COMPLAINING ABOUT NOT HAVING DUCKS!!! I've got a few ducks in our brake, and so long as my dog gets to pickup at least a mallard or two on every hunt I'm happy.