Things are a changing
- msbigdawg1234
- Duck South Addict
- Posts: 5145
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 9:07 pm
- Location: Vicksburg
Things are a changing
My name is Rick Daughtry.......
Well, I had a lot of money, but to the city went
I met too many good looking girls and that's where my money went
Yeah I know just where it went
No I ain't broke but I'm badly bent.
Well, I had a lot of money, but to the city went
I met too many good looking girls and that's where my money went
Yeah I know just where it went
No I ain't broke but I'm badly bent.
- BIG TIMBER
- Duck South Addict
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2002 11:14 am
- Location: Port Gibson
Re: Things are a changing
People are still using primitive weapons?



Heres to Long Legged Women, Banded Greenheads, and Long Spurs!!!
-
- Duck South Addict
- Posts: 2519
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 5:38 pm
- Location: Houston, MS
Re: Things are a changing
I don't like the idea of crossbows during bow season unless you have a disability or condition where you need one. I dont really care if they change the primitive weapon laws. They haven't been primitive in a long time, don't even consider it a difference anymore, just a different gun to carry.
Anyone wanna buy a HR .444 w/ scope?
Anyone wanna buy a HR .444 w/ scope?
work hard, play hard
Re: Things are a changing
Hell, the compound bows are anything but primitive and the H&R is a single shot rifle. Im sure both will pass but what about all the tax revenue every time the next "primitive weapon" hits the market. Like when the Knight muzzleloaders and then the handi.
Do you eat duck meat?
- MSDuckmen
- Duck South Addict
- Posts: 2805
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2001 12:01 am
- Location: Brandon, Ms
- Contact:
Re: Things are a changing
So many deer here what does it really matter? They are trying to give people more opportunity
Re: Things are a changing
And you would think this would work. More days hunting and more opportunity should mean more deer being harvested........BUT it just does not seem to be the case, at least in my area. I myself am guilty a lot of the time of not shooting a doe because I can always wait till a better day to do so (with so many available days to hunt). Not cold enough to let one hang today....maybe there is a good buck following this doe....got to be at Church toniight.....got to get up early tomorrow....I got a bunch of excuses to NOT shoot a deer. I have often wondered if MDWFP went the OTHER direction and limited the opportunity would we then in fact see antlerless deer harvest go up. Take a state like Illinois for example. Only so many days up there you can hunt with a gun. You going to let that short season go by passing on deer? Nope. Going to get you one or two in the freezer quick. Still a very liberal bag limit and high number of days to hunt, just not many with a gun. Longer bow seasons and long primitive weapon seasons along with a shorter gun season may be the trick to getting population numbers down??? Just a theory......MSDuckmen wrote:So many deer here what does it really matter? They are trying to give people more opportunity
Are we gonna get wet?
Re: Things are a changing
is this is something to possibly go into effect for the 2013-2014 seasons?
champcaller wrote:and THAT is a duck hunt.DUCK-HUNT wrote:
for exmaple you could kill a 4 greenheads (two banded), a mallard/black cross, and a mallard/gaddy cross and smash a hot blonde on the way back to the ramp and call it a hell of a day
Re: Things are a changing
I almost bout a 35 wheelen barrel for my encore in January. Decided to buy a pistol instead. Looks like that was a wise decision.
Peewee
Re: Things are a changing
They should do it for all land not just privet land but $$$$ got in the way.I read in the CL where the firarm dealer's (they named Van's) were crying about how much they'd lose if they change or do away with pm season.
Re: Things are a changing
A more important question to ask is "where has MSDuckmen been for the last year?"MSDuckmen wrote:So many deer here what does it really matter?
Haven't seen you in the mix in quite a while. Welcome back.
Re: Things are a changing
Primitive weapon, bow, crossbow, rifle, slingshot, etc... It doesn't matter to ME what You kill your deer with. If YOU think it shoudl be a primitive weapon, by all means feel free to use one, if YOU think it should be a bow, then by all means use one, but if I want to use a rifle or crossbow, then by all means I will. If you want to kill a deer, go kill it with whatever weapon you feel like using. I haven't used a "Primitive Weapon" in a long long time. Nothing primitive about the single shot rifles they got now. I just put one bullet in my 270 and call it a "primitive Weapon" No difference
- jdbuckshot
- Duck South Addict
- Posts: 3821
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 12:37 pm
- Location: Forest Mississippi
Re: Things are a changing
SWAG wrote:And you would think this would work. More days hunting and more opportunity should mean more deer being harvested........BUT it just does not seem to be the case, at least in my area. I myself am guilty a lot of the time of not shooting a doe because I can always wait till a better day to do so (with so many available days to hunt). Not cold enough to let one hang today....maybe there is a good buck following this doe....got to be at Church toniight.....got to get up early tomorrow....I got a bunch of excuses to NOT shoot a deer. I have often wondered if MDWFP went the OTHER direction and limited the opportunity would we then in fact see antlerless deer harvest go up. Take a state like Illinois for example. Only so many days up there you can hunt with a gun. You going to let that short season go by passing on deer? Nope. Going to get you one or two in the freezer quick. Still a very liberal bag limit and high number of days to hunt, just not many with a gun. Longer bow seasons and long primitive weapon seasons along with a shorter gun season may be the trick to getting population numbers down??? Just a theory......MSDuckmen wrote:So many deer here what does it really matter? They are trying to give people more opportunity
you are a genious.
All the best deer hunting states have this sort of set up. and they kill a bunch of deer, and a bunch of big deer.
"The rich ..... who are content to buy what they have not the desire to get by their own exertions, These are the real enemies of Game."
Re: Things are a changing
About a year ago I spoke to a local WMA official and we were discussing the issue of deer population in MS. He said that the real issue is not number of days, primitive weapon etc.... the real issue is the fact that the younger population just isn't hunting like they use to. Go back a generation or two and high school kids would routinely skip school, hit the woods as soon as class let out etc... Now, there is so much going on in the life of a teenager that hunting, even for the most avid of teen outdoorsman is way down the list of things to do.SWAG wrote:And you would think this would work. More days hunting and more opportunity should mean more deer being harvested........BUT it just does not seem to be the case, at least in my area. I myself am guilty a lot of the time of not shooting a doe because I can always wait till a better day to do so (with so many available days to hunt). Not cold enough to let one hang today....maybe there is a good buck following this doe....got to be at Church toniight.....got to get up early tomorrow....I got a bunch of excuses to NOT shoot a deer. I have often wondered if MDWFP went the OTHER direction and limited the opportunity would we then in fact see antlerless deer harvest go up. Take a state like Illinois for example. Only so many days up there you can hunt with a gun. You going to let that short season go by passing on deer? Nope. Going to get you one or two in the freezer quick. Still a very liberal bag limit and high number of days to hunt, just not many with a gun. Longer bow seasons and long primitive weapon seasons along with a shorter gun season may be the trick to getting population numbers down??? Just a theory......MSDuckmen wrote:So many deer here what does it really matter? They are trying to give people more opportunity
Re: Things are a changing
Thats back when hunting was cheap and there was no such thing as wealthy people running the lease prices through the roof. i know a ton of older men that said there aint no way in hell im gonna pay to hunt, so they just stopped. I stopped duck hunting bc of the cost so my son will not grow up watching the sun come up bt the cypress trees in a brake.Ster wrote:About a year ago I spoke to a local WMA official and we were discussing the issue of deer population in MS. He said that the real issue is not number of days, primitive weapon etc.... the real issue is the fact that the younger population just isn't hunting like they use to. Go back a generation or two and high school kids would routinely skip school, hit the woods as soon as class let out etc... Now, there is so much going on in the life of a teenager that hunting, even for the most avid of teen outdoorsman is way down the list of things to do.SWAG wrote:And you would think this would work. More days hunting and more opportunity should mean more deer being harvested........BUT it just does not seem to be the case, at least in my area. I myself am guilty a lot of the time of not shooting a doe because I can always wait till a better day to do so (with so many available days to hunt). Not cold enough to let one hang today....maybe there is a good buck following this doe....got to be at Church toniight.....got to get up early tomorrow....I got a bunch of excuses to NOT shoot a deer. I have often wondered if MDWFP went the OTHER direction and limited the opportunity would we then in fact see antlerless deer harvest go up. Take a state like Illinois for example. Only so many days up there you can hunt with a gun. You going to let that short season go by passing on deer? Nope. Going to get you one or two in the freezer quick. Still a very liberal bag limit and high number of days to hunt, just not many with a gun. Longer bow seasons and long primitive weapon seasons along with a shorter gun season may be the trick to getting population numbers down??? Just a theory......MSDuckmen wrote:So many deer here what does it really matter? They are trying to give people more opportunity
Do you eat duck meat?
Re: Things are a changing
Bubba that's the truth. Also can you imagine what they would do to kids now days if they found out they had a gun hid behind the seat of their truck to go hunting after school. I can remember when Mr. Harpole and I use to talk about if I was going hunting after school.
Peewee
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot] and 24 guests