DuckSouth.com

duramax wrote:I love how the founder of the Weather Channel has come out a publicly let everyone know that the theory that humans are causing global warming is the biggest scam, political or otherwise, ever created. He went in more detail to back up his statement, but I think his reputation stands for itself.

He's just got his head in the sand.

A fruitcake, properly prepared and stored, will last for 25 years.

There are 92 known cases of nuclear bombs lost at sea.

Live scorpions glow a greenish color when exposed to ultraviolet light.

I like biscuits

With mustard?

No. Blackburn's syrup. Out of the glass jar.

definitely a gravy man

See Massachussetts vs. United States decision by the US Supreme Court...9 Supreme Court justices- not politicians, not businessmen trying to cash in- but as impartial as it gets...7-2 decision found that EPA has the right to regulate carbon dioxide emissions BECAUSE carbon dioxide CAUSES GLOBAL WARMING

The debate is over- why not accept the Supreme Court ruling as proof that GW is real and it is manmade?

Hammerschmit, I thought you were gonna be to busy hunting to post on this anymore?

and...............Why would I listen to lawers over scientist?

Headed back to the woods as we speak but couldnt resist throwing a little napalm on your wounds with my upgraded IE 7.0 browsing software...

No real good news from the deer woods but I saw my first chase of the year this AM and passed on the biggest buck I've seen so far this year...A nice 115-120 inch, 3 1/2 year old 8 point...I was bow hunting and he would have made a nice bow kill but I dont shoot them unless I think they will make 125 net...

Then again, I killed 4 nannies with my bow and 4 more with my rifle so the freezer is full, some poor folks and working folks are happy (I keep backstraps only and give away the rest) and the season is only half way over so all is good...

Incidentally, when I do get out of the woods and back around the computer more often, I'll introduce another interesting discussion: THE YAZOO PUMPS. I'm sure you stinking genuises will have some similar uniformed BS commentary on that subject as GW.

The Supreme Court doesn't make my mind up for me. I can handle that task myself.

If the Supreme Court ruled that hunting is detrimental to wildlife populations would you drop everything and sell all of your gear and guns?

[quote="Hammer"]

Then again, I killed 4 nannies with my bow and 4 more with my rifle quote]

From mdwfp.com:

Antlerless Deer: The bag limit on antlerless deer is one (1) per day, not to exceed three (3) per license year; except that two (2) additional antlerless deer per license year may be taken with a bow and arrow.

4 bow +4 rifle =5?

Hammer wrote:See Massachussetts vs. United States decision by the US Supreme Court...9 Supreme Court justices- not politicians, not businessmen trying to cash in- but as impartial as it gets...7-2 decision found that EPA has the right to regulate carbon dioxide emissions BECAUSE carbon dioxide CAUSES GLOBAL WARMING

The debate is over- why not accept the Supreme Court ruling as proof that GW is real and it is manmade?

BECAUSE THEY ARE F'IN SUPREME COURT JUSTICES!!!!
not scientists

then you're retarded

all this talk of food is making me hungry