Re: MS Wildlife Extravaganza Boycott
Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2019 8:57 pm
In the most recent years past, did mike Vick still have a booth at the extravaganza?
Waterfowling Southern Style!
http://www.ducksouth.com/phpbb/
During the 2011 flood scenerio when they were predicting 109 ft on riverside stage at Steele Bayou i ran some numbers based off available lidar data..............deltadukman wrote:Dan, You may or may not can answer this, and its really irrelevant, but with a high river at Vicksburg, say 52-3 feet, has anyone done a study on where the water would cover if there were no backwater levees? I'm just curious. I'm not saying they don't serve their purpose because 95% of the time, they have. I would just be curious.
We ran some 101.5 flood maps back in 2016 and it was pretty bad. Don’t remember the exact extent but whole bunch of ground from Hwy 12 south under. 2011 was worse like Bill mentioned. If it had over topped and equalized to 107-108 Belzoni would have had couple feet of water if I remember right.deltadukman wrote:Dan, You may or may not can answer this, and its really irrelevant, but with a high river at Vicksburg, say 52-3 feet, has anyone done a study on where the water would cover if there were no backwater levees? I'm just curious. I'm not saying they don't serve their purpose because 95% of the time, they have. I would just be curious.
Glad there wasn’t a levee breach. Belzoni went to about 113-14 this year.DanP wrote:We ran some 101.5 flood maps back in 2016 and it was pretty bad. Don’t remember the exact extent but whole bunch of ground from Hwy 12 south under. 2011 was worse like Bill mentioned. If it had over topped and equalized to 107-108 Belzoni would have had couple feet of water if I remember right.deltadukman wrote:Dan, You may or may not can answer this, and its really irrelevant, but with a high river at Vicksburg, say 52-3 feet, has anyone done a study on where the water would cover if there were no backwater levees? I'm just curious. I'm not saying they don't serve their purpose because 95% of the time, they have. I would just be curious.
This was pretty much my thinking as well. It’s a nice change and mixes things up to hunting when the water gets up. However things just got out of hand this year. If they decide to put the pumps in I hope they will still let it get to 91 or so feet before turning the pumps on during hunting season.Wildfowler wrote:I am on record here as being against the pumps long ago the last time this was discussed here.
Long ago for selfish reasons I thought if the pumps were finished I could kiss goodbye any more freelance hunting at panther swamp or DNF during high water events like back in 05 at the end of the season.
The last two weeks of that season were some of the most fun I’ve had. Suddenly having 1000’s of acres of woods to hunt in.
By my way of thinking, any flooding would only be short term. What’s the worst that would happen? I thought to myself that farmers might not be able to plant corn that year and would have to just plant late beans instead if there was a late spring flood.
I wish to publicly apologize for being dead booty wrong about this issue.
I had no clue that 100’s of thousands of acres could remain flooded for six months straight.
Even if it was only recreational land affected. Not being able to manage for waterfowl crops for an entire season is devastating.
I am sorry. I was wrong in my way of thinking about the issue previously.
It is a debate I have thought of before.stang67 wrote: If one claims high MS River levels are “man made,” well OK, that’s not one I want to debate.
Yeah, it is an interesting thought. Add urbanization, poor soil and water conservation habits, climate change. But the what-ifs apply at home, too. For example, if every ag acre in the Yazoo, Steele floodplain were still in bottomland hardwoods, might any flooded acres have been spared?teul2 wrote:It is a debate I have thought of before.stang67 wrote: If one claims high MS River levels are “man made,” well OK, that’s not one I want to debate.
Imagine if you will, no levees, zero, none, nada from Venice to the Canadian border in the MS river system as a whole. Wouldn't the river levels be lower if the water had historic flood planes to back out into? Isn't the delta it self as a whole a historic MS river flood plane?
My comment was based on the use of pumps. Think of the flooding in those levee systems if they wouldn’t have had pumps. You’d have the south delta up and down the whole river system as bad as the south delta is. Man built the Steele bayou dam. They’ve built a whole lot of other dams but used a pumping system to prevent this. So yeah, the south delta is in a large part, man made.stang67 wrote:Yeah, it is an interesting thought. Add urbanization, poor soil and water conservation habits, climate change. But the what-ifs apply at home, too. For example, if every ag acre in the Yazoo, Steele floodplain were still in bottomland hardwoods, might any flooded acres have been spared?teul2 wrote:It is a debate I have thought of before.stang67 wrote: If one claims high MS River levels are “man made,” well OK, that’s not one I want to debate.
Imagine if you will, no levees, zero, none, nada from Venice to the Canadian border in the MS river system as a whole. Wouldn't the river levels be lower if the water had historic flood planes to back out into? Isn't the delta it self as a whole a historic MS river flood plane?