Can you post a picture of it ?deltadukman wrote:I ended up with the old original onward store sign. Still have it. I approached Molly if she wanted it to hang in the store(it only seemed right). She couldn't have cared less about it. It was almost trashed and I figured it would be cool to have hanging in there. She apparently didn't.
Onward Store
Re: Onward Store
Re: Onward Store
I knew as soon as Billy sent that letter the store was gonna tank. You don’t crap on people when they are under stress. I also find it funny that Billy is worried about saving South Delta wetlands but is supportive of a project that will destroy thousands of acres of critical wetlands in the Pearl River basin.southdeltan wrote:It had been losing money for a long time, a bit too far south for Sharkey county people and too far north for Vicksburg people.
The timing, however, is very suspect. Husband sends out letter against the pumps, people in the area get upset, store closes.
She'd already removed gas pumps recently and that didn't seem to me to be the sign of somebody looking to shut down.
Peewee
- NyssaAquatica
- Veteran
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 6:41 am
- Location: Money
Re: Onward Store
Which project is this?peewee wrote: I also find it funny that Billy is worried about saving South Delta wetlands but is supportive of a project that will destroy thousands of acres of critical wetlands in the Pearl River basin.
- Wildfowler
- Duck South Addict
- Posts: 4866
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2001 12:01 am
- Location: Mis'sippi
Re: Onward Store
I believe he’s referring to the two lakes project. A complete sham.
I would not be opposed to seeing the federal refuge that supposed to be going on the Rankin County side buying up all the land on the Madison and Hinds side as well and having the refuge exist on both sides.
I grew up as a kid with that treasure in my backyard and would hate to lose that wetland to development.
I would not be opposed to seeing the federal refuge that supposed to be going on the Rankin County side buying up all the land on the Madison and Hinds side as well and having the refuge exist on both sides.
I grew up as a kid with that treasure in my backyard and would hate to lose that wetland to development.
driven every kind of rig that's ever been made, driven the backroads so I wouldn't get weighed. - Lowell George
Re: Onward Store
Wildfowler wrote:I believe he’s referring to the two lakes project. A complete sham.
I would not be opposed to seeing the federal refuge that supposed to be going on the Rankin County side buying up all the land on the Madison and Hinds side as well and having the refuge exist on both sides.
I grew up as a kid with that treasure in my backyard and would hate to lose that wetland to development.
They have renamed and redesigned the 2 lake project to one lake and are trying to justify it by calling it a flood control project.
Peewee
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 26 guests