Jury Verdict in on Rebs

If it's sports related, it goes here! Try not to get your feelings hurt; it's all in fun.

Moderator: Sports Forum Mods

User avatar
MSDawg870
Duck South Addict
Posts: 5492
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Location: Hernando, MS

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby MSDawg870 » Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:31 pm

stang67 wrote:Testing....

DUMBASS
We have a hacker in our midst..^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
User avatar
southernmallard
Duck South Addict
Posts: 1400
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 9:42 pm
Location: Jackson
Contact:

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby southernmallard » Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:39 pm

camlock wrote:
southernmallard wrote:Just a quick fyi....

UofM did put up some points against Texas, but let's remember Mack Brown had the backup's backups in by the 3rd.
edit all that I typed...just asking a question instead...did you watch the whole game and follow any of the post game or you just assume since score was 66-31 that Texas blew Ole Miss out and put in back-ups and allowed Ole Miss to score some late to narrow the gap a bit???

we can agree to disagree on what would happen between two teams that aren't gonna play each other...but I'll say what I deleted again...if you gave up 21 to Troy, I'd expect 35+ to Texas. Of course, all hypothetical and each game is different...
Watched the entire game. You're right, Ole Miss wouldn't go away......the difference is that OM wouldn't go away against B & C teams. You can continue to tell yourself that OM is competitive, but I don't think you are fathoming that OM gave up SIXTY-SIX points at home.......

No excuses for Troy, we played down to our opponent. We will know a lot more about our team in a couple of weeks, but to think the game against texas would be comparable to ya'lls game vs. them is pretty humorous
GRHRCH Hilltop's Peanut Butter Crackers MH QAA - "Nab"
Jackson's Record Chasing Redux - "Riley"

HAIL STATE
User avatar
Po Monkey Lounger
Duck South Addict
Posts: 5975
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2001 12:01 am
Location: Sharby Creek

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby Po Monkey Lounger » Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:19 am

Hey, all I know is that I typed in the word "dumbarse" and it appeared in my post as "booty goober ". Got to be Goober22 at work.
You can't drink all day if you don't start in the morning.
User avatar
Greenhead22
Duck South Addict
Posts: 19203
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2001 12:01 am
Location: Mississippi/Louisiana/Arkansas

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby Greenhead22 » Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:57 am

Po Monkey Lounger wrote:Hey, all I know is that I typed in the word "dumbarse" and it appeared in my post as "booty goober ". Got to be Goober22 at work.
I have not been on word censor duty in awhile, so it wasn't me. :lol:
mlj300
Veteran
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:33 am
Location: Corinth

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby mlj300 » Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:57 am

Anyone who sees the Auburn game as "winnable" for Mississippi is delusional. Just because your team only got skull drug by 30 some odd points by a visiting and down Texas doesn't Suddenly make Mississippi a viable player in the SEC. Auburn is admittedly down with their QB situation and all but they wont have to score many points to beat Mississippi. In order to beat auburn UM will have to drive the ball which is something they have yet to do against anyone. Auburn wont give up the big first down plays and neither will anyone else after the Tulane game. This season is fixing to get long for the rebs.
Only Those Born & Raised in Nort East Mississippi Will Know Exactly What i MeanTo Those Set Adrift Amidst BrokeDick Rednecks,Radical Pentecostalism,Moonshine Bootleggers and PusserMania,There are Two Kings to Choose From-Elvis or Jesus.
-Jimbo Mathus
deltadukman
Duck South Addict
Posts: 7779
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 11:04 pm
Location: Crunksippi

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby deltadukman » Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:03 am

My honest jury verdict is this:

I like the Wallace kid at QB, but with him running straight up like he does, he wont last the entire season.
User avatar
Buckwabit
Duck South Addict
Posts: 3350
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:31 pm
Location: PTown if you down....

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby Buckwabit » Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:37 am

Greenhead22 wrote:
Po Monkey Lounger wrote:Hey, all I know is that I typed in the word "dumbarse" and it appeared in my post as "booty goober ". Got to be Goober22 at work.
I have not been on word censor duty in awhile, so it wasn't me. :lol:
Funny how you mention Goober22 and he responsed... :lol:
Chad Miley


I love the "Ole Man"..Plenty of Birds and No Company...
User avatar
webbmaster
Duck South Addict
Posts: 3520
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:01 am
Location: Alabama

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby webbmaster » Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:41 am

Troy put up 500 yards on the vaunted MSU defense.

Maybe Mullins should schedule a tough non-conference opponent one year and see what happens.

If Oklahoma (instead of S Alabama) would have come to Starkville and won by 28, would there really be any reason to be beating your chest and calling other fans delusional?

Do something.
User avatar
camlock
Duck South Sponsor
Posts: 5402
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:10 am

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby camlock » Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:00 am

deltadukman wrote:My honest jury verdict is this:

I like the Wallace kid at QB, but with him running straight up like he does, he wont last the entire season.
true...that almost came to fruition against Texas, he got POPPED once and came off looking like he was about to throw up...
User avatar
camlock
Duck South Sponsor
Posts: 5402
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:10 am

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby camlock » Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:07 am

southernmallard wrote:
camlock wrote:
southernmallard wrote:Just a quick fyi....

UofM did put up some points against Texas, but let's remember Mack Brown had the backup's backups in by the 3rd.
edit all that I typed...just asking a question instead...did you watch the whole game and follow any of the post game or you just assume since score was 66-31 that Texas blew Ole Miss out and put in back-ups and allowed Ole Miss to score some late to narrow the gap a bit???

we can agree to disagree on what would happen between two teams that aren't gonna play each other...but I'll say what I deleted again...if you gave up 21 to Troy, I'd expect 35+ to Texas. Of course, all hypothetical and each game is different...
Watched the entire game. You're right, Ole Miss wouldn't go away......the difference is that OM wouldn't go away against B & C teams. You can continue to tell yourself that OM is competitive, but I don't think you are fathoming that OM gave up SIXTY-SIX points at home.......

No excuses for Troy, we played down to our opponent. We will know a lot more about our team in a couple of weeks, but to think the game against texas would be comparable to ya'lls game vs. them is pretty humorous
Ole Miss offense is competitive and they will score points against 1st team defenses, they have some player makers as long as everybody stays healthy...I totally understand that we gave up 66 points, I said back in week one that our defense was going to be a big problem, and it is...but just b/c our defense has major work to do doesn't undermine the fact our offense went toe to toe with Texas, a quality opponent and given our current roster state and past 3 years, that is encouraging....that is my only simple point, if anyone wants to further oppose that then nothing left I can say or assume but that you didn't watch the game or you so badly want Ole Miss to not improve that you refuse to acknowledge any positive.
User avatar
camlock
Duck South Sponsor
Posts: 5402
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:10 am

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby camlock » Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:08 am

webbmaster wrote:Troy put up 500 yards on the vaunted MSU defense.

Maybe Mullins should schedule a tough non-conference opponent one year and see what happens.

If Oklahoma (instead of S Alabama) would have come to Starkville and won by 28, would there really be any reason to be beating your chest and calling other fans delusional?

Do something.
but they beat Auburn :twisted:
deltadukman
Duck South Addict
Posts: 7779
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 11:04 pm
Location: Crunksippi

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby deltadukman » Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:17 am

camlock wrote:
webbmaster wrote:Troy put up 500 yards on the vaunted MSU defense.

Maybe Mullins should schedule a tough non-conference opponent one year and see what happens.

If Oklahoma (instead of S Alabama) would have come to Starkville and won by 28, would there really be any reason to be beating your chest and calling other fans delusional?

Do something.
but they beat Auburn :twisted:

And OM had a national championship moral victory against Texas....it really is eating you up isnt it?
User avatar
arduckslayer
Duck South Addict
Posts: 2088
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:50 pm
Location: Winona

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby arduckslayer » Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:35 am

stang67 wrote:Testing....

DUMBASS
Is this like when everyone found out $#!+ wasn't censored anymore?



















Dumbass. That is all.
User avatar
camlock
Duck South Sponsor
Posts: 5402
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:10 am

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby camlock » Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:41 am

deltadukman wrote:
camlock wrote:
webbmaster wrote:Troy put up 500 yards on the vaunted MSU defense.

Maybe Mullins should schedule a tough non-conference opponent one year and see what happens.

If Oklahoma (instead of S Alabama) would have come to Starkville and won by 28, would there really be any reason to be beating your chest and calling other fans delusional?

Do something.
but they beat Auburn :twisted:

And OM had a national championship moral victory against Texas....it really is eating you up isnt it?
nope

i only commented b/c it's funny that had I made the same exact remarks webbie made, yall would be all up in arms and bashing Ole miss...but b/c he says it, and it's true and he's a Bama fan....silence...that is entertaining to me, sorry it just is
User avatar
Po Monkey Lounger
Duck South Addict
Posts: 5975
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2001 12:01 am
Location: Sharby Creek

Re: Jury Verdict in on Rebs

Postby Po Monkey Lounger » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:55 am

UM will have to drive the ball which is something they have yet to do against anyone.
Now who is delusional? :lol: :lol: The Rebs are only averaging a little over 500 yards of offense per game. Yes, we can do better and need to step it up. But, driving the ball on offense has not been the problem.

Now, on the defensive side of the ball, there is obviously a leak in the line. :wink:
You can't drink all day if you don't start in the morning.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 3 guests