More Bush Bullschit

This forum is for general discussion that doesn't fit in the other topic-specific forums.
User avatar
DuckyDan
Veteran
Posts: 893
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 8:59 am
Location: Tupelo, MS

Postby DuckyDan » Wed Jun 16, 2004 12:59 pm

Well, they may now. I'm sorry, I have all the respect in the world for those people who lost loved ones on 9/11 and all, but they need to quit trying to blame someone and blame the damned terrorists! Those people had loved ones who died and all they want now is to try and sue people over the matter! If the govt. would've known about it, they would've stopped it, but that's a whole nother story. There's another thread on here somewhere about how the acts of terrorism have gone unchallenged for years....Clinton was a wimp, but that's another story. If we would've shot down those planes, the same people griping now would have done the same if not more because the White House authorized shooting down of a civilian airliner. They would've said that they MIGHT have landed safely, etc. If they would have shot the planes down over the city, the debris would have been more dangerous probably than what did happened. It's a cluster f*** if you know what I mean. No matter what could have happened, it would've been bad. These people need to quit blaming Americans and blame the terrorists. The same people pointing the finger at Bush are the same ones defending the terrorists. You're either with us of against us. PERIOD. This 9/11 panel is the dumbest thing I've ever seen and the whole media has all of these liberals wrapped up in "It's Bush's fault...he knew about it."

Whatever.
Sometimes the best call is no call at all...
User avatar
teul2
Duck South Addict
Posts: 13579
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2001 12:01 am
Location: Delta
Contact:

Postby teul2 » Wed Jun 16, 2004 2:02 pm

Benny wrote:NO WMD'S


They have found WMD 3 times, open your ears.
Looking for 2 duck calls from Dominic Serio of Greenwood (ones for Novacaine)
"Most Chesapeakes, unless in agreement that it is his idea, will continually question the validity of what he is being asked to do" - Butch Goodwin
User avatar
DuckyDan
Veteran
Posts: 893
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 8:59 am
Location: Tupelo, MS

Postby DuckyDan » Wed Jun 16, 2004 2:13 pm

Ben, if anyone were going to be impeached, it would've been Clinton for perjury.

I ain't givin you the satisfaction of an argument on this subject. You know where I stand.
Sometimes the best call is no call at all...
User avatar
mudsucker
Duck South Addict
Posts: 14137
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 4:15 am
Location: Brandon,Ms by way of LaBranche Wetlands

Postby mudsucker » Wed Jun 16, 2004 6:17 pm

What you benn smoking Ben-ne-high-na!!! OH YEAH, good Jamacian Sinsemilea!!! Lighten the f%#k up, will ya!
Long Live the Black Democrat!
GEAUX LSU!
WHO DAT!
DO,DU AND DW!
User avatar
mudsucker
Duck South Addict
Posts: 14137
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 4:15 am
Location: Brandon,Ms by way of LaBranche Wetlands

Postby mudsucker » Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:13 pm

:wink:
Long Live the Black Democrat!
GEAUX LSU!
WHO DAT!
DO,DU AND DW!
mallardhunter
Veteran
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2001 12:01 am
Location: State of Confusion

Re: More Bush Bullschit

Postby mallardhunter » Sat Jun 19, 2004 4:16 am

Benny wrote:The panel investigating the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks found that there was "no credible evidence that Iraq and al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States," according to a staff report released today. The report contradicts recent statements from the Bush administration that Saddam Hussein had ties to al Qaeda.


Clutching at straws today, are we? Ignoring Putin's warnings, eh? What does "cooperated on attacks" have to do with "had ties to . . ."? During WWII, Russia "did not cooperate" in the attack on Normandy Beach, yet definitely "had ties to" the Allies who did. Duh!
Will Duck Hunt For Food.
Have You Called Your Duck Today?
Read "The Third Terrorist" by Jayna Davis
mallardhunter
Veteran
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2001 12:01 am
Location: State of Confusion

Postby mallardhunter » Sat Jun 19, 2004 4:34 am

In Iraq, when the US found huge caches of insecticides and pesticides buried underground, camouflaged, hidden, and stored with large caches of artillery, missiles, ammunition, weapons, Rocket-Propelled-Grenades, etc., most folks didn't get it. They thought, "they haven't found jack diddle schitt . . .". It's just typical agricultural products . . . that were found buried underground and stored with ammo, rockets, etc.? Why would the Iraqis' hide bug spray with ammo? Because the insecticides and pesticides are the building blocks to deadly nerve gas/agent. All of the ingredients were in place to cook up a batch of nerve gas on the spot and sling it rocket-style, or use the Migs we found buried in the sand or the RC planes found, or have the suicid-ists deliver it in person.
Those folks who don't buy into this theory should be reminded of the two guys in Oklahoma who only had some diesel fuel and fertilizer in a truck a few years ago. Nothing less than a gray, metal cylinder with the word "BOMB" stenciled on it will satisfy those who choose to not see the truth.
Will Duck Hunt For Food.
Have You Called Your Duck Today?
Read "The Third Terrorist" by Jayna Davis
gyver
Veteran
Posts: 191
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2001 12:01 am
Location: bobo,ms.
Contact:

Postby gyver » Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:26 am

didn't ol'bill clinton say that saddam was an imminant threat and had the wmd's? or was he just using that as an excuse to bomb them everytime another one of his scandals came to light?

W 4 more years.
keep the man with his balls attached in the white house and the one that ain't sure where his are in massachusettes. 8)
west > east
32
User avatar
Delta Duck
Duck South Addict
Posts: 2334
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2001 12:01 am
Location: The Delta
Contact:

Postby Delta Duck » Sun Jun 20, 2004 12:33 pm

Yo Benny, You need to turn that liberal CNN $#!+ off. I know it not your fault you can not reason for yourself. I can understand how the weak minded can be brain washed into following all that those liberal SOB's tell you. I really thought you would be able to break free from the mind games those domestic terrorist have over the weak minded!

I heard CNN make a comment that they had missed the meaning of the report. If you are going to post everything those no count liberal SOB's are going to report when are you going to update about being misinformed! :wink:
"Ducks on the Brain"
It's always better with a good dog and good friends, Ducks and no Terrorist!
http://www.DeltaDucks.com
User avatar
DuckyDan
Veteran
Posts: 893
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 8:59 am
Location: Tupelo, MS

Postby DuckyDan » Mon Jun 21, 2004 10:16 am

Is Benny Michael Moore, the guy who produced this stupid Farenheit 9/11 movie?

I think he's Benny! :lol:
Sometimes the best call is no call at all...
Schemy
Regular
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 4:19 pm
Location: Lamar, CO

Postby Schemy » Wed Jun 23, 2004 11:49 am

Benny wrote:what the !@#@ does that have to do with NO TIES to Iraq to justify what dick headed bush did?

NO TIES TO IRAQ

NO WMD'S

The whole thing is BULLSCHIT so they can get at the oil PERIOD.

And the whole "Gosh Darnit" world knows it too, and they knew it when he did it. He killed a thousand of our kids, he should be impeached or exiled from America and so should Cheny.


If this was for oil, why am I still paying $2/gallon for regular unleaded.

My brother is over in Iraq right now, and says that the good done over there is worth the price. Hussein would have attacked us sooner or later, and if they had no ties to al Queda then why are all those SOB's beheading captives in Iraq. There was a link and just because the liberal media has twisted the truth so far that you only hear about lack of evidence, not what evidence was there. WMD's are there and will be found, but they have to search an entire country, and guess what they don't play by our rules. They hide and cheat and lie to keep those babies out of sight. Bottom line is Hussein needed to be dealt with, and since the UN couldn't muster up the rocks to do it, G Dubya did. I am damn thankful that Bush is in the white house, because if Gore was in there we would still be debaiting whether or not we should even think about doing something after 9/11.
Schemy
User avatar
Poke
Regular
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:48 am
Location: usa

Postby Poke » Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:28 am

Benjamin: in your haste to run something up the flag pole......you forgot to think before you spoke. The operative words are "cooperate" and "link". Very different meanings in the context of what is being claimed. I have not heard the administration say that saddam cooperated in the attacks...however..I have heard and read about the links. The 9/11 commission documents an iraqi intel. fella meeting atta (leader of the attacks) perjhaps several times. There may be no link for the planning/evecution on 9/11...however...birds of a feather flock together...that is what I believe the administration is implying.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 8 guests