Greenwood considering ban on smoking
Greenwood considering ban on smoking
Didn't think i would see this in this town.
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?news ... 4621&rfi=6
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?news ... 4621&rfi=6
Looking for 2 duck calls from Dominic Serio of Greenwood (ones for Novacaine)
"Most Chesapeakes, unless in agreement that it is his idea, will continually question the validity of what he is being asked to do" - Butch Goodwin
"Most Chesapeakes, unless in agreement that it is his idea, will continually question the validity of what he is being asked to do" - Butch Goodwin
- jacksbuddy
- Duck South Addict
- Posts: 4874
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:24 pm
- Location: In the office and pretending to work
-
- Duck South Addict
- Posts: 1546
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:21 pm
lipsplitter39654 wrote:yeah the owner is the owner but i should have the right not to have to smell the nasty shiiit if i go out.
Like I said I do not care one way or another, but I think the owner should have the final say, and if the customer does not want to "smell the nasty shiiit" , they do not have to eat or shop there.
- rjohnson
- Duck South Addict
- Posts: 4895
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:28 am
- Location: Brandon, MS
- Contact:
lipsplitter39654 wrote:yeah the owner is the owner but i should have the right not to have to smell the nasty shiiit if i go out.
Last time I checked smoking was not a right, only a cancerous addiction that most of America would like to be without. It's a public health concern. The costs of treating smoking related illness is high. There is no reason on earth anyone should smoke, end of story.
http://www.lithicIT.com My biz
-
- Duck South Addict
- Posts: 1131
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 8:27 am
rjohnson wrote:lipsplitter39654 wrote:yeah the owner is the owner but i should have the right not to have to smell the nasty shiiit if i go out.
Last time I checked smoking was not a right, only a cancerous addiction that most of America would like to be without. It's a public health concern. The costs of treating smoking related illness is high. There is no reason on earth anyone should smoke, end of story.
Actually smoking is a right. Just like many other freedoms we enjoy that are now getting infringed upon. However, smokers don't have a right to cause health problems for someone else. That's why I get so upset about this issue and I don't even smoke. It's not about the smoke, it's about someone's God given right to kill themselves with a cancerous addiction if they want to. I'm sick and tired of people and the government telling me what I can or can't do to myself because it's "For my own well being". Hell, they aren't even giving bar owners the right to decide how to run their own businesses. If you want to smoke in a bar then you should be able to go to a bar that allows smoking. Granted said bar should have to very conspicuously sign the entrance saying that it is a smoking establishment, God forbid a non-smoker walks in mistakenly and hurts their precious lungs. If people don't want to inhale smoke then go to a non-smoking establishment and likewise for the smokers. But at least give the people back their choice.
DuckTater wrote:rjohnson wrote:lipsplitter39654 wrote:yeah the owner is the owner but i should have the right not to have to smell the nasty shiiit if i go out.
Last time I checked smoking was not a right, only a cancerous addiction that most of America would like to be without. It's a public health concern. The costs of treating smoking related illness is high. There is no reason on earth anyone should smoke, end of story.
Actually smoking is a right. Just like many other freedoms we enjoy that are now getting infringed upon. However, smokers don't have a right to cause health problems for someone else. That's why I get so upset about this issue and I don't even smoke. It's not about the smoke, it's about someone's God given right to kill themselves with a cancerous addiction if they want to. I'm sick and tired of people and the government telling me what I can or can't do to myself because it's "For my own well being". Hell, they aren't even giving bar owners the right to decide how to run their own businesses. If you want to smoke in a bar then you should be able to go to a bar that allows smoking. Granted said bar should have to very conspicuously sign the entrance saying that it is a smoking establishment, God forbid a non-smoker walks in mistakenly and hurts their precious lungs. If people don't want to inhale smoke then go to a non-smoking establishment and likewise for the smokers. But at least give the people back their choice.
Then why sue the smoking company and get millions after you get cancer? It's self inflicted. Health insurance rates are on the rise partly due to the high amount of smokers in America. I would say there's probably alot more non-smokers than smokers in America. Look at more rest., there's generally more seating for non-smokers. The biggest reason I don't goto clubs and bars because the smoke. I hate the smell of it and my eyes dry up like a desert.
I don't mind smoking people, I do mind inconsiderate smokers. Those that light up at will, blow smoke in your directions when they clearly see your not smoking, etc.
The one thing for me that would ruin a beautiful brunette in blue jeans climbing out of a 4wd truck is her puffing on a cig.
"I hear they are developing a new fighter specially for fighting in the middle east. It's called the F-U!" - crow, Aug. 2008
Member FLHC
Lane Romero
Member FLHC
Lane Romero
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 15 guests