MAN!!! TALK ABOUT A SEG-WAY! thanks marty.....i've been waiting for a post VERY similar to that.....
so, in the words of doc holliday, "barba, you may proceed sir."
troy and i were sittin around having a brew and we got to talking about that seminar and some of the things he brought home w/ him....ONE of which was how Lardy viewed and used e-collar corrections....personally, i found it very interesting....
troy, i hope i do this justice as i'm paraphrasing you paraphrasing lardy, and if not, step in and save my drowning booty,

....
anyhow, it seems that lardy goes that extra mile NOT to burn a dog....a dog blows a cast off, he looks at his background.....a dog slips a whistle, he's on the horn asking the nearest BB if he could hear it...things of this nature....
BUT, when it was time, he didn't waste his time or the dog's chance to learn w/ a NICK...he wanted the dog to take heed about the wrong decision....
now, seemingly (again per the convo), SEVERAL folks didn't understand this -- prolly not believing it, not sure i woulda at the time.......seems lardy made a HUGE point that "although he doesn't use the NICK feature settling on the CONSTANT, he doesn't prescribe to an ALL OUT burn -- unless fully warranted of course....stating that the nick feature is TOO fast, not creating an impression w/ the dog, and that even the CONSTANT when pressed and released as fast as he could, is still a longer "burn" than the NICK offers.....seems he really wanted folks to understand that last point.....to him, the NICK nags, the constant feature IMPRESSES....
seems most on here had thought about it per the posts, good on ya.......i hadn't, not directly anyway, BUT it caused me to look at my corrections....
over the last year or so, IMHO, i've matured as a trainer and a handler....i've found myself giving dude the benefit of the doubt more often than not, trying to understand WHY he did something vs. the CONSTANT use of a heeling stick....personally, i think dude decided that the heeling stick was "just part of it"......more of a nag, if you will, than anything else....
to that end, i not necessarily "softened" my stance, but i finally realized how good he can be, and that more often than not, he's not giving me the bird, but giving me his heart, trying his damnedest.......thus, NOT justifying what i had put him thru...
recently, i've noticed his training REALLY getting sharp....the corrections (whatever they may be) are fewer and farther b/t.....i'm having to do less attrition as a result, and make fewer runs.
BUT, when it's time, IT'S TIME...........and, it's personal..........making a lasting impression in him......
i liken this to the use of the collar........when it's time, it's time, so make an impression........
marty is dead on IMHO about the use of attrition.....it's just like any and everything else in training....if used TOO MUCH, i think the dog just says, "ok, it's just part of it." THAT'S where i think the rubber meets the road in training...being able to read a dog and knowing the correct correction....
i told someone recently who was asking if i thought i understood the use of the collar that, "although the subtleness during CC i don't quite grasp right now, i feel i use of it in the field...........when i had finally reached the point that i needed to run to gauge, w/ the next pup, i'd push the button."
this is admittedly a rudamentary line of thought, but it's all i got right now....but, a pup should HOPEFULLY be forthcoming.....
great thoughts folks, gator