kaustin wrote:This has always puzzled me. Why is planting not baiting? You plant something for the sole purpose of the wildlife and then hunt over it. It's done with almost all hunting, including waterfowl. Millet is planted as food for ducks, never attempted to be harvested, and then hunted over. It all is baiting to some degree so why prosecute the lazy guy who just skips the planting and throughs out food. I know what the law is and yes I follow it and plant food plots and hunt over them. My problem is with the law itself. It all just seems hypocritical. O.K. I'm off my soapbox, sorry for the interuption.
If you feel that way I got to ask why are you doing...Please don't say cause its legal if you don;t agree with it then dont but saying it something you dont think should be done and you do it is hypocritical to Me...
Not baiting you to a arguement just wonder where your coming from