Mullen...

If it's sports related, it goes here! Try not to get your feelings hurt; it's all in fun.

Moderator: Sports Forum Mods

Laus
Veteran
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 8:38 pm

Re: Mullens...

Postby Laus » Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:50 pm

MSDawg870 wrote:Yal must have thought we were going to win today.
very funny
Take it easy and if its easy take it home.
User avatar
QUACKERS
Duck South Addict
Posts: 3726
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Florence,MS

Re: Mullens...

Postby QUACKERS » Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:09 pm

Greenhead22 wrote:. This isn't damn high school football. You can't run the same plays back to back and hope for good results.
Your right it's freakin Ms State football.

ok state seemed to run the same play over and over and over and over with great success.....

What happened to the the QB that was so highly touted from Fl? Russell is not the answer.

Back to the beers!
Last edited by QUACKERS on Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
If some animals are good at hunting and others are suitable for hunting, then the Gods must clearly smile on hunting.
SNOT
Duck South Addict
Posts: 1325
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:37 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: Mullens...

Postby SNOT » Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:59 pm

QUACKERS wrote:
Greenhead22 wrote:. This isn't damn high school football. You can't run the same plays back to back and hope for good results.
Your right it's freakin Ms State football.

Clemson seemed to run the same play over and over and over and over with great success.....

What happened to the the QB that was so highly touted from Fl? Russell is not the answer.

Back to the beers!
Cord Sandberg ended up going the baseball route.
adame
Duck South Addict
Posts: 1195
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:21 am
Location: Aviano, IT

Re: Mullens...

Postby adame » Sun Sep 01, 2013 1:15 am

REBEL DUCK wrote:Yeah I quests that was silly huh y'all suck!
Image
Rice
Duck South Addict
Posts: 2436
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:41 pm
Location: Everywhere

Re: Mullens...

Postby Rice » Sun Sep 01, 2013 2:32 pm

It's a lot easier to pull for state when you really deep down accept the fact that until we have a qb that doesn't look like a stiff slow uncomfortable turtle that looks exactly where he will throw as soon as he gets the ball and then when it isn't open he ignorantly forces it or take 3 of the slowest scramble steps in college football history before being sacked...we won't have much offense. Perk can only do do much.
A man who won't has no advantage over the man who can't.
User avatar
litlhitch
Veteran
Posts: 587
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2002 9:31 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: Mullens...

Postby litlhitch » Sun Sep 01, 2013 3:52 pm

Rice wrote:It's a lot easier to pull for state when you really deep down accept the fact that until we have a qb that doesn't look like a stiff slow uncomfortable turtle that looks exactly where he will throw as soon as he gets the ball and then when it isn't open he ignorantly forces it or take 3 of the slowest scramble steps in college football history before being sacked...we won't have much offense. Perk can only do do much.
We are better with Dak, no doubt. Hope Tyler is not cleared to play next two games..if he just sits out Alcorn, they won't give Dak any credit...if he beats Alcorn and Auburn, maybe Mullen has to take him seriously.
My goal in life is to be as good a person as my dog already thinks I am
Rice
Duck South Addict
Posts: 2436
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:41 pm
Location: Everywhere

Re: Mullens...

Postby Rice » Mon Sep 02, 2013 7:21 am

I am not saying he is the answer either. They both just look so frozen and slow. The point is Tyler isn't going to be he answer so why not try him. There is nothing to lose?
A man who won't has no advantage over the man who can't.
User avatar
Nitro Mag
Veteran
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 12:21 pm
Location: Merigold

Re: Mullens...

Postby Nitro Mag » Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:49 am

Yep, time for Russell to hit the bench and give Dak a chance. Offense looked better with him in the game anyway. Defense did their job, the offense just didn't give any help. Play calling was terrible and I think that has a lot to do with Russell. They are scared to do much with Russell because he folds under pressure whether from a defense or just a clutch situation.
bigoak
Duck South Addict
Posts: 1048
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 8:43 am

Re: Mullens...

Postby bigoak » Mon Sep 02, 2013 11:27 am

Whose fault is it that we only have Tyler and Dak to choose from at QB? There is a reason wo don't have top QBs wanting to come play for Mullen and Koening? Russell was committed before Croom was let go. Just imagine what the QB situation would be like if Russell had not stuck with his commitment. Then they take a huge risk on Sandberg when there was a 99% chance he was going pro. QB recruiting has been disappointing under Mullen.
User avatar
4dawgma
Duck South Addict
Posts: 6346
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 9:03 pm

Re: Mullens...

Postby 4dawgma » Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:31 pm

MSU with a qb? That's funny!
Where'd who go?
Rice
Duck South Addict
Posts: 2436
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:41 pm
Location: Everywhere

Re: Mullens...

Postby Rice » Tue Sep 03, 2013 4:28 am

Tyler pulled an Alex Smith...got a concussion and will never play again now.
A man who won't has no advantage over the man who can't.
SWAG
Duck South Addict
Posts: 3209
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 1:07 pm
Location: TALLAHATCHIE COUNTY

Re: Mullens...

Postby SWAG » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:56 am

Not sure Dak is the perfect answer either...but have to wonder how far along he would be if MSU had invested as much time in him as they have Russell. I could see Dak being Relf-like in a lot of ways.
Are we gonna get wet?
Bonehead
Duck South Addict
Posts: 1242
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:06 pm
Location: Brandon, MS

Re: Mullens...

Postby Bonehead » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:03 am

SWAG wrote:Not sure Dak is the perfect answer either...but have to wonder how far along he would be if MSU had invested as much time in him as they have Russell. I could see Dak being Relf-like in a lot of ways.

THAT. I think the only way State does anyting this year besides lose is to have Dak run an offense similar to what Relf did at State. Defenses must have to account for a qb that can run, otherwise they will pin their ears back and mop the floor with Russel.
User avatar
tombstone
Duck South Addict
Posts: 4948
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 12:38 pm
Location: little chicago

Re: Mullens...

Postby tombstone » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:00 pm

Rice wrote:It's a lot easier to pull for state when you really deep down accept the fact that until we have a qb that doesn't look like a stiff slow uncomfortable turtle that looks exactly where he will throw as soon as he gets the ball and then when it isn't open he ignorantly forces it or take 3 of the slowest scramble steps in college football history before being sacked...we won't have much offense. Perk can only do do much.

I appreciate the fact that you are a realist and don't mind calling a spade a spade.
There will be a day....
ms_deer_hunter
Veteran
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: ms

Re: Mullens...

Postby ms_deer_hunter » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:54 pm

That would be Mullen. No S at end !!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests