Timber Question
-
- Regular
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 12:21 pm
- Location: Winterville, MS
Timber Question
If a logger is cutting timber and they accidentally cross a property line and cut timber on the adjacent property are there any repercussions? Probably less than $4,000 worth merchantable timber on the adjacent property with old dilapidated fence marking property line.
Re: Timber Question
saw it on the timber company show on TV. The other owner gets profits now if I understood it correctly. Something like that.
May the wind always be at your back and the sun upon your face, and may the wings of destiny carry you aloft to dance with the stars.
Cheers, Georgie.
Spectra Shot Rep
Mojo Dealer
Bettis Custom Calls Pro Staff
Cheers, Georgie.
Spectra Shot Rep
Mojo Dealer
Bettis Custom Calls Pro Staff
Re: Timber Question
Contractor is gonna point the finger at the timber company. Timber company is gonna point at the contractor. You're gonna point at the fence. Timber company is going to point at the survey. You're gonna disagree with survey. etc... Go ahead and get a lawyer and a surveyer lined up. I doubt anyone is going to willingly accept responsibility.
deltadukman: "We may not agree on everything, but we all like t!tties"
Re: Timber Question
It's either triple stumpage I believe.
When it come's to duck calling and duck killing its the indian not the arrow!
- timberjack
- Duck South Addict
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2001 1:01 am
- Location: Louisville, MS
- Contact:
Re: Timber Question
Its called timber trespass. If it was an honest mistake the penalty is usually double stumpage (twice the normal value of the wood) at the most and single stumpage at the least. If they willfully and knowingly cut across the line then it is usually triple stumpage. Speak directly to the logger first and try to work it out without any lawyers. Timber is cheap and you may spend more on attorney fees than the timber is actually worth. If that doesnt work then contact the law enforcement division of the Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce. They have guys who specialize in timber trespass. Good luck.
-
- Duck South Addict
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2001 1:01 am
- Location: greenwood
Re: Timber Question
SEC. 95-5-10. Cutting trees without consent of owner.
(1) If any person shall cut down, deaden, destroy or take away any tree without the consent of the owner of such tree, such person shall pay to the owner of such tree a sum equal to double the fair market value of the tree cut down, deadened, destroyed or taken away, together with the reasonable cost of reforestation, which cost shall not exceed Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) per acre. The liability for the damages established in this subsection shall be absolute and unconditional and the fact that a person cut down, deadened, destroyed or took away any tree in good faith or by honest mistake shall not be an exception or defense to liability. To establish a right of the owner prima facie to recover under the provisions of this subsection, the owner shall only be required to show that such timber belonged to such owner, and that such timber was cut down, deadened, destroyed or taken away by the defendant, his agents or employees, without the consent of such owner. The remedy provided for in this section shall be the exclusive remedy for the cutting down, deadening, destroying or taking away of trees and shall be in lieu of any other compensatory, punitive or exemplary damages for the cutting down, deadening, destroying or taking away of trees but shall not limit actions or awards for other damages caused by a person.
(2) If the cutting down, deadening, destruction or taking away of a tree without the consent of the owner of such tree be done willfully, or in reckless disregard for the rights of the owner of such tree, then in addition to the damages provided for in subsection (1) of this section, the person cutting down, deadening, destroying or taking away such tree shall pay to the owner as a penalty Fifty-five Dollars ($55.00) for every tree so cut down, deadened, destroyed or taken away if such tree is seven (7) inches or more in diameter at a height of eighteen (18) inches above ground level, or Ten Dollars ($10.00) for every such tree so cut down, deadened, destroyed or taken away if such tree is less than seven (7) inches in diameter at a height of eighteen (18) inches above ground level, as established by a preponderance of the evidence. To establish the right of the owner prima facie, to recover under the provisions of this subsection, it shall be required of the owner to show that the defendant or his agents or employees, acting under the command or consent of their principal, willfully and knowingly, in conscious disregard for the rights of the owner, cut down, deadened, destroyed or took away such trees.
(3) All reasonable expert witness fees and attorney's fees shall be assessed as court costs in the discretion of the court.
(1) If any person shall cut down, deaden, destroy or take away any tree without the consent of the owner of such tree, such person shall pay to the owner of such tree a sum equal to double the fair market value of the tree cut down, deadened, destroyed or taken away, together with the reasonable cost of reforestation, which cost shall not exceed Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) per acre. The liability for the damages established in this subsection shall be absolute and unconditional and the fact that a person cut down, deadened, destroyed or took away any tree in good faith or by honest mistake shall not be an exception or defense to liability. To establish a right of the owner prima facie to recover under the provisions of this subsection, the owner shall only be required to show that such timber belonged to such owner, and that such timber was cut down, deadened, destroyed or taken away by the defendant, his agents or employees, without the consent of such owner. The remedy provided for in this section shall be the exclusive remedy for the cutting down, deadening, destroying or taking away of trees and shall be in lieu of any other compensatory, punitive or exemplary damages for the cutting down, deadening, destroying or taking away of trees but shall not limit actions or awards for other damages caused by a person.
(2) If the cutting down, deadening, destruction or taking away of a tree without the consent of the owner of such tree be done willfully, or in reckless disregard for the rights of the owner of such tree, then in addition to the damages provided for in subsection (1) of this section, the person cutting down, deadening, destroying or taking away such tree shall pay to the owner as a penalty Fifty-five Dollars ($55.00) for every tree so cut down, deadened, destroyed or taken away if such tree is seven (7) inches or more in diameter at a height of eighteen (18) inches above ground level, or Ten Dollars ($10.00) for every such tree so cut down, deadened, destroyed or taken away if such tree is less than seven (7) inches in diameter at a height of eighteen (18) inches above ground level, as established by a preponderance of the evidence. To establish the right of the owner prima facie, to recover under the provisions of this subsection, it shall be required of the owner to show that the defendant or his agents or employees, acting under the command or consent of their principal, willfully and knowingly, in conscious disregard for the rights of the owner, cut down, deadened, destroyed or took away such trees.
(3) All reasonable expert witness fees and attorney's fees shall be assessed as court costs in the discretion of the court.
Happy Happy Happy
Re: Timber Question
Peewee
-
- Duck South Addict
- Posts: 7779
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 11:04 pm
- Location: Crunksippi
Re: Timber Question
they are probably going to point their finger at who ever flagged the lines, which in most cases was done by the person they had cruising it
Return to “General Discussion Forum”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 107 guests